Met Police Officer Accused of Leaking Confidential Information to Outspoken Police Critic

A Met Police officer faces misconduct charges for allegedly feeding information to a journalist known for her controversial views on the Police

When it comes to public trust in policing, transparency and accountability sit firmly at the forefront. These principles are essential to maintaining confidence in law enforcement. However, they face challenges when allegations of misconduct emerge. In a recent development involving the Metropolitan Police, a serving officer, 26-year-old Matthew Olive, stands accused of breaching these very principles.

The allegations against PC Olive came to light during a Southwark Crown Court hearing on Tuesday. Prosecutor Dickon Reid outlined the charges: five counts of misconduct in public office between 29 December, 2022, and 22 June, 2023. These charges stem from claims that Olive allegedly accessed police databases and systems unlawfully to pass sensitive information to journalist Rebecca Tidy.

Tidy, a vocal critic of police practices and transparency, is known for her outspoken views on the police. She has also sparked public debate with her advocacy for the legalisation of drugs such as heroin and MDMA.

---

---

A Case in Progress

PC Olive has not yet entered pleas to the charges. Initially scheduled for this week, his hearing was adjourned, with the next pre-trial preparation hearing (PTPH) set for 7 March. Until then, Olive remains on unconditional bail.

Presiding over the brief hearing, Judge Usha Karu informed Olive that he would be required to attend court in March to confirm his plea, stating:

“You are next required to attend court on 7 March, when you will be asked to enter your pleas to this indictment, whether it be guilty or not guilty.”

It is important to underscore that at this stage, these allegations remain unproven, and Olive, like anyone accused, is entitled to the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.

Balancing Trust and Scrutiny

---

Got a story or video to share? Need to get something off your chest?

Our team of experienced former emergency services and armed forces personnel wants to hear from you! With 300,000 monthly views, your story could reach a wide audience. Email us at contact@emergency-services.news.

---

This case arises amid ongoing discussions about how best to maintain public confidence in policing. While some high-profile incidents have raised questions about accountability, it is equally important to recognise the tireless efforts of 99.9% of people within the police force to uphold public trust.

The allegations also raise complex questions about the boundaries between journalistic inquiry and the safeguarding of sensitive information. For police officers, access to confidential systems carries immense responsibility. If breached, it risks compromising not only operational security but also public trust in those tasked with enforcing the law.

Waiting for Answers

As this story unfolds, it will undoubtedly fuel ongoing debates about transparency, ethics, and the evolving relationship between the press and the police. Regardless of the outcome, this case serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between institutional integrity and public accountability.

If you would like to stay updated on this story, make sure that you subscribe to this newsletter.

OPINION: The Duty of Silence?

In the world of journalism, the pursuit of truth often leads reporters directly to the doorstep of those in uniform. Police officers, by the nature of their work, are frequently in the spotlight. However, if approached by journalists from the mainstream media, especially those with a known bias against the police, the golden rule for officers has always been: say nothing.

The practice of maintaining silence isn't about hiding from accountability; it's about protecting the integrity of ongoing investigations, the rights of all parties involved, including colleagues and the sanctity of law enforcement processes.

Here are several reasons why this policy is vital: