ESN Report

ESN Report

Share this post

ESN Report
ESN Report
Outrage as Veteran Senior Cop Fired Over Stop Oil Comments: Public Rallies Behind Sacked Officer
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Outrage as Veteran Senior Cop Fired Over Stop Oil Comments: Public Rallies Behind Sacked Officer

After 27 years of service, Inspector Meredith's career ends over social media posts. Is this justice or a chilling example of "cancel culture" in policing?

Jan 17, 2025
∙ Paid
5

Share this post

ESN Report
ESN Report
Outrage as Veteran Senior Cop Fired Over Stop Oil Comments: Public Rallies Behind Sacked Officer
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share

Share

When Inspector Ross Meredith joined the police force 27 years ago, he likely never envisioned that his career would end not with a retirement celebration thanking him for dedicating nearly 30 years of his life to protecting the public, but with a dismissal that has ignited passionate support for the officer. The veteran officer was sacked for comments made on social media about the controversial climate change activist group, Stop Oil. While his remarks were raw, many are questioning whether the punishment fits the crime. Has this dismissal become a symbol of policing's increasingly precarious balancing act between enforcing the law and appeasing public opinion?

The Context: What Happened?

Inspector Meredith, a senior officer with decades of service, faced an accelerated misconduct hearing after comments he posted on X. Having spotted the comments, someone reported him. He described Stop Oil protestors as behaving like "spoilt special needs kids" and accused them of having a "mental health condition." In another post, he referred to the group as "an evil cult" whose protests were "futile tantrums."

Merseyside Police deemed these remarks to be gross misconduct, citing breaches of professional standards, including discreditable conduct, equality and diversity, and respect and courtesy. Assistant Chief Constable Alex Ross, who chaired the hearing, stated that Meredith's comments were "offensive, derogatory, and unbecoming of a police officer" and concluded that his senior position amplified the severity of his actions.


Enjoying our content? Don’t miss out—join our free newsletter for more stories that matter, or step up as a paid subscriber to directly support our mission of standing with the emergency services community. Your support makes all the difference!


The dismissal means that Meredith's name will be added to the College of Policing's barred list, effectively ending any chance of a return to the profession he served for nearly three decades. Given the treatment he has received, it raises the question of whether returning to such an environment would even be desirable for someone with his extensive service and dedication.

The Fallout: Public Reaction and Support for Meredith

The decision has sparked a wave of support for the sacked officer, with many people arguing that his punishment was disproportionate. Social media has been abuzz with posts questioning the fairness of the ruling.

One individual posted: "Completely disproportionate. Reflective practice would have been a better way to manage this @MerseyPolice. A veteran officer gone. Hope he appeals."

Another lamented the loss of Meredith's experience, stating: "This epitomises the political captivity in which policing is now held. We need experienced officers more than ever – they are the gold within the system."

Mike Pannett, a former police officer and author, weighed in: "Surely words of advice would have been the way to address this. Sacking a man who'll have put his neck on the line countless times for a comment. Absolutely ridiculous."


Our team of experienced former emergency services and armed forces personnel wants to hear from you! With 300,000 monthly views, your story could reach a wide audience. Email us at contact@emergency-services.news.

Share ESN Report


Others expressed broader concerns about the state of policing. One commenter argued: "And you wonder why they all fall into line. Why they run with zeal to arrest people for hurty words but ignore actual crime. Because they'll be sacked if they aren't preaching and worshipping from the cultural Marxist hymn sheet."

Harry Stephenson, a former Detective Superintendent, shared his frustration, stating: "Absolute nonsense. Once again common sense action goes out of the window and the Politically correct Woke Brigade triumph. The panel making this decision should really be examining their decision making not bowing to Political Pressure."

Amidst these reactions is a sentiment echoed by many: the belief that years of dedication, courage, and selflessness should count for something. Meredith has likely saved lives, faced danger head-on, and borne the weight of the most harrowing incidents imaginable during his career. To dismiss such service over poorly worded frustration feels, to his many supporters, not only unfair but a betrayal of the very commitment officers pledge to their communities.

The Bigger Picture: Just Stop Oil and the Strain on Policing


Loading...

Share


While the debate over Meredith's dismissal continues, the broader issue of Just Stop Oil protests looms large. These protests have placed enormous strain on already strained police resources. The Metropolitan Police reported spending over £9 million between April and June 2024 on managing Stop Oil demonstrations. Additionally, during the first four weeks of their 2023 slow-march campaign, over 11,000 officer shifts were lost.

Critics argue that such resource-intensive operations detract from frontline policing and addressing actual crimes, deeply compounding frustrations among officers like Meredith who witness these challenges daily. This context raises the question: Was Meredith's frustration—albeit inappropriately expressed—a reflection of the deeper pressures faced by the police force?

A Call for Fairness

Inspector Meredith's apology and acknowledgement of his actions demonstrate that he understood the impact of his words. Yet, his supporters argue that a 27-year career should not be erased by a handful of online comments, particularly when those comments stemmed from a genuine frustration with the challenges of modern policing.


Enjoying this post from ESN Report? It's public, so don’t keep it to yourself—share it with friends, colleagues, or anyone who supports our emergency services, the NHS, or armed forces!

Refer a friend


Disciplinary measures are essential to maintaining public trust in the police, but they must also be fair and proportionate. Meredith's case has left many asking whether this decision reflects justice or an overzealous attempt to align policing with a shifting cultural landscape, one increasingly powered by a very small but very vocal minority.

Losing seasoned officers like Meredith not only deprives forces of invaluable experience but also sends a chilling message to others in the profession. At a time when policing is under immense pressure, can we afford to lose such expertise over ill-judged words?

Where Do We Go From Here?

As Meredith considers his right to appeal, his case serves as a lightning rod for a broader discussion about the future of policing. Are officers being held to impossible standards? How do we balance inclusivity with the need for robust, experienced leadership? And most importantly, how do we ensure that discipline within the force is both fair and constructive, and that it does not bow down to the vocal minority?

It's time for the public to engage with these questions and support those who risk everything to keep us safe. Whether you agree with the decision or not, Meredith's case is a reminder that the people behind the uniform are human too—flawed, yes, but also deserving of understanding and fairness.

OPINION: Fired for Frustration: Is Free Speech Dead in Britain?

In a country that once prided itself on championing liberal values, the sacking of Inspector Ross Meredith serves as a wake-up call for those who value free speech. After nearly three decades of dedicated service, Meredith was not celebrated as a hero but cast aside for voicing his frustrations about Just Stop Oil protestors on social media. His dismissal isn't just the story of one officer; it's a stark warning that the very principle of free expression is under attack in Britain.

Though blunt and pointed, Meredith's comments were not personal attacks but reflections of a frustrated officer grappling with the immense strain of modern policing. Dealing with disruptive protests from groups like Just Stop Oil has pushed resources and officers to breaking point. Yet, instead of sparking a necessary debate about the pressures on the police, Meredith's words were met with swift and unforgiving punishment: gross misconduct, immediate dismissal, and a lifetime ban. Is this justice, or are we witnessing the triumph of an outspoken minority wielding disproportionate influence?

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to ESN Report to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 865 Digital Media Ltd
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More